hckrnws

Legendary. This is going to be very helpful, and the TAM is getting bigger. Thank you guys for this, and for all the learnings in-batch -- I'm excited for the future!

I reckon I could run this for buying fashion drops, is this a use case y'all have seen?

Love your accent!

Congrats on the launch!

I don’t know if this is a problem you’ve faced, but I’m curious: how do LLM tool devs handle authn/authz? Do host apps normally forward a token or something? Is there a standard commonly used? What if the tool needs some permissions to act on the user’s behalf?

There are companies like https://www.keycard.sh/ taking this on. There are other competitors too but I can't think of them atm

Good question! Specifically around computer-use agents (CUAs), I haven't seen much exploration yet - and I think it’s an area worth exploring for vertical products. For example, how do you securely handshake between a CUA agent and an API-based agent without exposing credentials? If everything stays within a local cluster, it's manageable, but once you start scaling out, authn/authz becomes a real headache.

I'm also working on a blog post that touches on this - particularly in the context of giving agents long-term and episodic memory. Should be out next week!

bravi! the future is the Agent OS - How robust is the UI element detection and interaction across different apps and inside navigating complex menus? Is it resistant to UI changes? That's often where these automations get brittle.

thank you e forza Cua

Congrats! How do you guys deal with SOC2/HIPAA/etc.? Or are those separate concerns?

Thanks! Great question - those are definitely relevant, but they depend a lot on the deployment model. Since CUAs often run locally or in controlled environments (e.g. a user’s own VM or cluster), we can sidestep a lot of traditional SOC2/HIPAA concerns around centralized data handling. That said, if you're running agents across org boundaries or processing sensitive data via cloud APIs, then yeah - those frameworks absolutely come into play.

We're designing with that in mind: think fine-grained permissioning, auditability, and minimizing surface area. But it’s still early, and a lot of it depends on how teams end up using CUAs in practice.

How's it different from e2b computer use?

We’re still figuring things out in public, but a few key differences:

- Open-source from the start. Cua’s built under an MIT license with the goal of making Computer-Use agents easy and accessible to build. Cua's Lume CLI was our first step - we needed fast, reproducible VMs with near-native performance to even make this possible.

- Native macOS support. As far as we know, we’re the only ones offering macOS VMs out of the box, built specifically for Computer-Use workflows. And you can control them with a PyAutoGUI-compatible SDK (cua-computer) - so things like click, type, scroll just work, without needing to deal with any inter-process communication.

- Not just the computer/sandbox, but the agent too. We’re also shipping an Agent SDK (cua-agent) that helps you build and run these workflows without having to stitch everything together yourself. It works out of the box with OpenAI and Anthropic models, UI-Tars, and basically any VLM if you’re using the OmniParser agent loop.

- Not limited to Linux. The hosted version we’re working on won’t be Linux-only - we’re going to support macOS and Windows too.

Active development of CUA, according to GitHub

Would love to use this for TestDriver, but needs to support Windows :*(

Windows host support is on our roadmap - we're currently exploring virtualization options with KVM/QEMU. Please join the discussion on our Discord: https://discord.com/invite/mVnXXpdE85

will this also be available as a hosted service? Or do you have instructions on how to manage a fleet of these manually while you're building the orchestration workflows?

Yes, we’re currently running pilots with select customers for a hosted service of Cua supporting macOS and Windows cloud instances. Feel free to reach out with your use case at founders@trycua.com

I tried this three times. Twice a few days ago and once just now.

First time: it opened a MacOS VM and started to do stuff, but it got ahead of itself and starting typing things in the wrong place. So now that VM has a Finder window open, with a recent file that's called

  plt.ylabel('Price(USD)').sh

  INFO:cua:VM run response: None
  INFO:cua:Waiting for VM to be ready...
  INFO:cua:Waiting for VM macos-sequoia-cua_latest to be ready (timeout: 600s)...
  INFO:cua:VM status changed to: stopped (after 0.0s)
  DEBUG:cua:Waiting for VM IP address... Current IP: None, Status: stopped
  DEBUG:cua:Waiting for VM IP address... Current IP: None, Status: stopped
  DEBUG:cua:Waiting for VM IP address... Current IP: None, Status: stopped
  INFO:cua:VM status changed to: running (after 12.4s)
  INFO:cua:VM macos-sequoia-cua_latest got IP address: 192.168.64.2 (after 12.4s)
  INFO:cua:VM is ready with IP: 192.168.64.2
  INFO:cua:Initializing interface for macos at 192.168.64.2
  INFO:cua.interface:Logger set to INFO level
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Logger set to INFO level
  INFO:cua:Connecting to WebSocket interface...
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Waiting for Computer API Server to be ready (timeout: 60s)...
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Attempting WebSocket connection to ws://192.168.64.2:8000/ws
  WARNING:cua.interface.macos:Computer API Server connection lost. Will retry automatically.
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Still waiting for Computer API Server... (elapsed: 10.0s, attempts: 11)
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Still waiting for Computer API Server... (elapsed: 20.0s, attempts: 21)
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Still waiting for Computer API Server... (elapsed: 30.0s, attempts: 31)
  WARNING:cua.interface.macos:Computer API Server connection lost. Will retry automatically.
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Still waiting for Computer API Server... (elapsed: 40.0s, attempts: 41)
  INFO:cua.interface.macos:Still waiting for Computer API Server... (elapsed: 50.1s, attempts: 51)
  ERROR:cua.interface.macos:Could not connect to 192.168.64.2 after 60 seconds
  ERROR:cua:Failed to connect to WebSocket interface
  DEBUG:cua:Computer initialization took 76856.09ms
  ERROR:agent.core.agent:Error in agent run method: Could not connect to WebSocket interface at 192.168.64.2:8000/ws: Could not connect to 192.168.64.2 after 
  60 seconds
  WARNING:cua.interface.macos:Computer API Server connection lost. Will retry automatically.

These versions:

  cua-agent==0.1.29
  cua-computer==0.1.23
  cua-core==0.1.5
  cua-som==0.1.3

Thanks for trying out c/ua! We still recommend pairing the Omni loop configuration with a more capable VLM, such as Qwen2.5-VL 32B, or using a cloud LLM provider like Sonnet 3.7 or OpenAI GPT-4.1. While we believe that in the coming months we'll see better-performing quantized models that require less memory for local inference, truth is we're not quite there yet.

Stay tuned - we're also releasing support for UI-Tars-1.5 7B this week! It offers excellent speed and accuracy, and best of all, it doesn't require bounding box detection (Omni) since it's a pixel-native model.

Thanks. I'll try that, but right now it's not working at all, i.e. cua can't interact with the VM at all. That's a not a model issue.

If you're running Cua from VS Code or Cursor, have you checked out this issue? https://github.com/trycua/cua/issues/61

Feel free to ping me on Discord (I'm francesco there) - happy to hop on a quick call to help debug: https://discord.com/invite/mVnXXpdE85

THIS IS FIRE been wanting this for ages

Thank you for your support!

this is really cool! congrats on the launch

Thank you - we appreciate your support!

A superfan of this product!

Thank you - your support means a lot to us!

This is precisely what I am looking for but for Windows. We need to automate some Windows native apps.

In the meantime, I’ll give this a shot on macOS tonight. Congrats!

Yes - pig.dev is a great product! You should definitely check it out.

Also, let us know on Discord once you’ve tried out c/ua locally on macOS: https://discord.com/invite/mVnXXpdE85

Check out pig: https://pig.dev

(I am not affiliated)

I do recall looking at it before but was concerned about HIPAA if they are storing data on their servers as well.

Also, is the project still active? No commits for 2 months is odd for a YC startup in current batch :)

i love this — isolation and permissioning for computer use agents. why can’t i use regular docker containers to deploy my computer use agent?

Congrats on the launch! Awesome product!

Thanks — we really appreciate your support!

Amazing product! Congrats on the launch!

Thank you so much - we truly appreciate your support!

This is cool! We built a similar thing with AgentDesk https://github.com/agentsea/agentdesk

Would love to chat sometime!

I love AgentDesk’s take on Kubernetes - it’s something we had considered as well, but it didn’t make much sense for macOS since you can only spin up two macOS VMs at a time due to Apple’s licensing restrictions.

Feel free to join our Discord so we can chat more: https://discord.com/invite/mVnXXpdE85

Thats a fantastic way to get your IP banned :)

That's great.

Also built something on top of Browser Use (Nanobrowser) and Docker.

https://github.com/reindent/nanomachine

Just finished planning and shell capabilities

Lets chat @reindentai (X)

Sure - just followed you back!

Love this !

Thank you - we appreciate it!

This is insane y'all

Thank you - we appreciate it!