hckrnws
Author here, wild to see this at the top of HN!
You can play it here: https://patricktrainer.github.io/duckdb-doom/
Pressing “L” enables (very) verbose logging in the dev console and prints much of the sql being executed.
Finally somebody did it! Back in the day my attempts to write a game in SQL were thwarted by buggy query-optimizers. They cached my calls to rand() way too often although documentation promised not to do that.
> They cached my calls to rand() way too often although documentation promised not to do that.
For some DBs (SQL Server definitely), RAND() and similar are handled as if they are deterministic and so are called once per use. For instance:
SELECT TOP 10 RAND() FROM sys.objects
SELECT TOP 10 RAND() FROM sys.objects
SELECT TOP 10 RAND(), RAND(), RAND()-RAND() FROM sys.objects
This surprises a lot of people when they try “… ORDER BY RAND()” and get the same order on each run.
One workaround for this is to use a non-deterministic function like NEWID(), though you need some extra jiggery-pokery to get a 0≤v<1 value to mimic rand:
SELECT TOP 10 CAST(CAST(CAST(NEWID() AS VARBINARY(4)) AS BIGINT) AS FLOAT)/(4.0*1024*1024*1024) FROM sys.objects
Like running Doom on a printer, but now it’s in the same engine powering your BI dashboards. Peak 2025 energy.
Very interesting!
You know it gets wild when you read "... Here's the core of the raycasting algorithm in SQL"!
> But because tick() and render() involved async database calls, sometimes a new interval would fire before the previous one finished.
This is a tricky one when writing games using async APIs. The game I've been working on is written in C# but I occasionally hit the same issue when game code ends up needing async, where I have to carefully ensure that I don't kick off two asynchronous operations at once if they're going to interact with the same game state. In the old days all the APIs you're using would have been synchronous, but these days lots of libraries use async/await and/or promises and it kind of infects all the code around it.
It does depend on the sort of game you're building though. Some games end up naturally having a single 'main loop' you spend most of your time in, i.e. Doom where you spend all your time either navigating around the game world or looking at a pause/end-of-stage menu - in that case you can basically just have an is_menu_open bool in your update and draw routines, and if you load all your assets during your loading screen(s), nothing ever needs to be async.
Other games are more modal, and might have a dozen different menus/scenes (if not hundreds), i.e. something like Skyrim. And sometimes you have modals that can appear in multiple scenarios, like a settings menu, so you need to be able to start a modal loop in different contexts. You might have the player in a conversation with an NPC, and then during the conversation you show a popup menu asking them to choose what to say to the NPC, and they decide while the conversation menu is open they want to consult the conversation log, so you're opening a modal on top of a modal, and any modal might need to load some assets asynchronously before it appears...
In the old days you could solve a lot of this by starting a new main loop inside of the current one that would exit when the modal went away. Win32 modal dialogs work this way, for example (which can cause unpleasant re-entrant execution surprises if you trigger a modal in the wrong place). I'm still uncertain whether async/await is a good modern replacement for it.
Given the first post in the blog says "not made by a [ROBOT EMOJI]", should I assume this one which does not have this message, is made by a [ROBOT EMOJI]?
I swear we're gonna start seeing disclaimers like "100% handcrafted code, our devs eat only grass-fed beef, free-range devops teams, specialty coffee sustained QA department, no IDEs, no intelisense, we code in notepad++" soon...
100% organic!
Ha! I made this. I’m not a robot either :)
it's the footer at the bottom of all pages. it's also present on the blog pages
This one also has that same footer.
Nice project. Reminds me of one of my favourite demos, a MySQL raytracer:
Comment was deleted :(
This is great! I did a similar project a while back to do image processing in a SQL database with pixels being individual records. It's amazing what SQL can do with the right table structures.
We use duck db wasm to make live system performance dashboards based on eBPF.
It really is magic!
You can check it out here.
Neat UI, are you using a library for that?
nope. everything off shelf was too slow.
Impressive project, the subhead might attract even more attention: "Building a SQL-Powered Doom Clone in the Browser"
You can use requestAnimationFrame to prevent race in the renderer
Abusing databases is the way. I'm building a SQLite agent using triggers.
I’ve been using triggers as FTS boilerplate for so long I didn’t pause to think that they’re just event listeners. Say more about your project..?
What sort of agent?!
I'd like to see something like this done in SpacetimeDB which was made specifically for game backends. I haven't looked into it yet, only seen the 1.0 announcement on HN and in my YT feed, and curious how its feature set makes this sort of thing easier or more natural.
i think this is super wild honestly, cant believe sql is doing graphics now
I'm a bit new to this stuff, but SQL and 3D GRAPHICS???
This is a DuckDB feature that's incredibly hard for Snowflake (or anyone else) to copy. Running the same database client-side (WASM) and server-side can make for a pretty magical experience.
Queries that normally take 1s to 2s can run in 25ms, so you get under the "100ms rule" which is very uncommon in analytics applications.
We DuckDB server side and have experimental support for DuckDB WASM on the client-side at https://www.definite.app/ and sometimes I don't trust that a query ran because of how fast it can happen (we need some UX work there).
How does that work? Does the client clone the database at the beginning of the session and work with a shapshot? If so, do you automatically and periodically sync it?
With HTTP Range Requests, which is typically used for pausing and resuming large file downloads, to request specific byte ranges from the file. This allows you to retrieve only the data you need. With SQL indexes, the data returned will be minimal because the lookup is optimized. However, if you select *, you will still end up downloading the entire database.
Parent comment isn't asking how data is requested from the back-end.
GP comment is (seemingly) describing keeping an entirely client side instance (data stored locally / in memory) snapshot of the back-end database.
Parent comment is asking how the two are kept in sync.
It's hard to believe it would be the method you're describing and take 25ms.
If you're doing http range requests, that suggests you're reading from a file which means object storage or disk.
I have to assume there is something getting triggered when back end is updating to tell the client to update their instance. (Which very well could just be telling it to execute some sql to get the new / updated information it needs)
Or the data is entirely in memory on the back end in an in memory duckdb instance with the latest data and just needs to retrieve it / return it from memory.
Doesn't that mean you have way more round-trips than necessary? Instead of asking for the row, you ask for the file header, the list of tables and indices, an index page, another index page, another index page, and a table page?
Yes, we're still fine-tuning exactly what we cache, but a simple example would be:
1. user writes a `select` statement that return 20k records. We cache the 20k.
2. user can now query the results of #1
we're also working on more complex cases (e.g. caching frequently used tables).
Comment was deleted :(
Crafted by Rajat
Source Code